All of this stuff contributes to 90% declines, but the main reason is we keep listing empty ledgers with no products on them in the multi-billion dollar range.
Network value is based on the amount of use and users. For networks with no users, that value is zero.
The real scandal here is Berachain raised $200m, which you don’t need to write software and basically guarantees failure for an L1.
They made special undisclosed deals with trading firms, which is not good.
They also sold locked tokens to a DAT, which proved said tokens aren’t locked and the team has no integrity.
And they allocated massive token supply to R&D and ecosystem funds, which will lead to waste and open the door to corruption.
Are these decisions unique to them? No. Has almost every chain that has followed a similar approach in the past 5 years failed? Yes.
But it’s 2025 and they went that route anyway, handing the retail users who believed in them a 90% decline.
That’s the real scandal.
1,151
10
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。