All of this stuff contributes to 90% declines, but the main reason is we keep listing empty ledgers with no products on them in the multi-billion dollar range.
Network value is based on the amount of use and users. For networks with no users, that value is zero.
The real scandal here is Berachain raised $200m, which you don’t need to write software and basically guarantees failure for an L1.
They made special undisclosed deals with trading firms, which is not good.
They also sold locked tokens to a DAT, which proved said tokens aren’t locked and the team has no integrity.
And they allocated massive token supply to R&D and ecosystem funds, which will lead to waste and open the door to corruption.
Are these decisions unique to them? No. Has almost every chain that has followed a similar approach in the past 5 years failed? Yes.
But it’s 2025 and they went that route anyway, handing the retail users who believed in them a 90% decline.
That’s the real scandal.
1,092
10
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。